1. The Plaintiff shall sell the F forest land 397m2 to an auction and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price.

1. Of the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the text of the claim for partition of co-owned property (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the Plaintiff owned 1/4 of shares, Defendant B, and C, 1/4 of shares, Defendant D, and E, respectively. The fact that no agreement has been reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants as to the method of partition of the instant real estate, which is jointly owned by the Plaintiff, does not conflict between the parties, or that agreement on the method of partition of the instant real estate was reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, may be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings, and according to the above facts acknowledged, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the instant real estate, may file a claim for partition against the Defendants, who are other co-owners,

(1) The court below held that the co-owned property of this case shall be sold to the plaintiff on May 9, 2014 and agreed to divide the price into shares. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the above agreement, and even if there is such agreement, it does not hinder the plaintiff's filing of the lawsuit for partition of co-owned property of this case, unless there is evidence to acknowledge that the agreement among all co-owners, including the defendant C, has been formed.