logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.01.13 2020나72676
건물인도
Text

The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court, shall be amended as follows:

(a)..

Reasons

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or modification as follows. Thus, this is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The following is added to the basic facts of the judgment of first instance No. 1 of the part added, and “A’s evidence No. 5” is added to the grounds for recognition.

E. On July 2, 2020, the Defendants delivered water for lease purposes of this case to the Plaintiff according to the provisional execution procedure of the judgment of the first instance.

[....]

3. The amendment of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2 is subject to the amendment as follows.

According to the above facts, on December 12, 2019, the Defendants’ instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated upon receiving the instant complaint. As such, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to deliver water for the instant lease to the Plaintiff, and the remainder after deducting 30 million won from the overdue rent of 3,1250,000 won until October 24, 2019, 1250,000 won, and from November 1, 2019 to July 2, 2020, the delivery of water for the instant lease purpose 22,17,419 won per annum from the day after July 2, 2019 to the day when the delivery of water for the instant lease is completed 20,000 won per annum of 2,750,000 won per annum of 2,750,000 won per annum of 2,000 won per annum of 2,301,205,214,275,201.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case extended in this court should be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims should be dismissed as there is no reason.

arrow