logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.05.14 2013고정2376
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are scam and victims E are the knife of the Defendants.

On August 29, 2013, at around 23:14, the Defendants conducted a dispute with the victim due to the appraisal of sprink from the “sprinkp” in the New-dong of the Gwangju Mine-gu to the issue of peace, etc., and Defendant A was sprinked with the victim, and Defendant A was sprinked with the victim’s face and head by putting the sprinke back on the floor by gathering the beer World Cup from his table, cutting it up by hand, sprinking the victim’s sprink, and Defendant B sprinked the victim’s sprink by sprinking the head and head with the victim’s hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as two-time open wound, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Ethical certificate of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on video CDs at each damaged site;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A’s assertion of innocence as to Defendant A’s assertion of innocence under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act only led the victim to house, and Defendant A did not participate in the Defendant B’s act. However, according to the result of viewing each of the above damage scene CDs implemented in this court, Defendant A’s charge can be found guilty.

(In particular, in light of the CCTV 23:14:00 screen from outside, Defendant A remains the victim at the time of assault by Defendant B, and Defendant A processes the victim for Defendant B’s crime. The reasons for sentencing are as follows: (a) the Defendants did not have any previous conviction; (b) the relationship between the Defendants and the victim; and (c) the extent of each assault against the Defendants against the victim.

arrow