The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered by the defendant is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The crime of this case was committed under the circumstances that the defendant borrowed an amount equivalent to the purchase price of a vehicle under the name of a person who asks for a loan to the defendant and purchased the vehicle, and then acquired money from the financial company for the purpose of melting the vehicle immediately, and there is a concern that the disposed vehicle might be abused as a substitute car, etc., the crime is very bad in quality of the crime, the damage amount of the crime of this case (19 million won) is not recovered, and the defendant committed again the crime of this case even though he had the record of being sentenced to a fine or suspended sentence due to the same power, but there is no possibility that the crime of this case was committed again. However, as stated in the judgment of the court below, the crime of this case was led to the confession of the crime of this case and the violation, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than one year at the Daegu District Court of 200,000,000 won, and the crime of this case and the crime of this case becomes final and conclusive within the first 3700,0,00,0,00,00, more punishment of the crime of this case.