logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.04.11 2017구합21830
협상대상자 선정 무효
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

A. 3) Disciplinary action (in accordance with the frequency of disciplinary action, such as restrictions on participation in bidding, etc., applicable in accordance with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes for the last three years) such as restrictions on participation in bidding, etc. 3) 5 project performance evaluation week similar to the project in question. 4) Costs of installation of non-park facilities 10 to 20 park building plans, 6) project implementation plan 6 project implementation plan 10 project implementation plan 20, reality and feasibility of the project implementation plan 100, 25 project performance and participation in the project implementation plan 3) total of 100 weeks, including restrictions on participation in bidding (in accordance with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes for the recent three years, 4) 5 project performance evaluation week, 5 project performance and participation in the relevant project, 10 to 25 years of expertise and participation in the relevant project, 15 years of less than 25 project performance and participation in the relevant project, 15 years of less than 5 project expertise and participation in the relevant specialized personnel 15 years of less than 25 years (2. 5 years of expertise).

D. On November 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a project service agreement with H representative of the G Building Office to participate in the instant project, and submitted a proposal and an assessment report to the Defendant on November 28, 2016.

On the other hand, the intervenor submitted a revised proposal and evaluation statement concerning the project of this case to the defendant on the same day.

E. On December 5, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff and the Intervenor of the data, such as the proposal and proposal review manual (PT output, hereinafter “specification”) to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City parks and greenbelts department (hereinafter “PT output”) within the time limit (20:00 on December 9, 2016), and notified the Plaintiff and the Intervenor of the direct shipment. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant will participate in the proposal review related to the instant project.

arrow