Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Criminal facts

The name and poor person who caused the telephone financial fraud crime of "2019No7188" made false statements that he/she would misrepresent his/her employees to a large number of unspecified victims, and would make a substitute loan at low interest, thereby seeking fraud with the content that he/she would receive money from the victims through a person in charge of cash collection business.

Therefore, from October 4, 2019 to October 7, 2019, the name-free person who is the cause of the telephone financial fraud organization makes phone calls to the victim B and did not intend to actually make a loan, but it is possible to make a loan unless there is a low interest rate for ordinary people who are employees of the CF. D. There is a low interest rate for ordinary people who are employees of the CF. It is possible to do so without delay. The loan is made in sequence with the fact that the CB app was installed on a mobile phone and the loan was approved. The loan was approved. The other name-free persons thereafter called the victim again and then called the victim to the EF. Even if there was an application for additional loan to CF even if there was an existing loan, 50% of the penalty would be punished by the reduction of penalty from the FF. On the other hand, it is possible to get a loan without being subject to a reduction of the reduction of the KRW 15,824,000.

On October 7, 2019, the victim got out 16:04, cash 16,000 won at the location of the bank from the main office of the G Bank, and moved to the I convenience store located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and then became an employee of the E Bank according to the direction of the person who was killed in the name.

Meanwhile, the Defendant received in advance the victim’s money or transferred it to the account designated by the person who was not entitled to receive the money under the direction of the person who was not entitled to receive the said telephone financial fraud organization. As seen above, the Defendant was under the circumstance that the victim was accused of the person who was not entitled to receive the money and waiting for the staff of the E bank.