logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.07.07 2015고단899
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by imprisonment with labor for the obstruction of business at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 20, 2016.

The Defendant, from October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014, worked as a worker for daily work at the new site of “D apartment” located in Pyeongtaek-si C, but did not receive part of the wage, she left a letter stating that the payment of wage would be caused by red painting, etc. in the above construction site, etc., and had the intention to interfere with the construction work by locking the entrance, etc. of the above construction site and receive wage.

1. Around 13:40 on January 15, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the property damage by harming the utility of the market price in which the damaged party left the letters, such as “inwards or inwards,” “inwards,” “influences,” “inf,” and “inf, influences,” etc., on the new fence of the victim E-stock company’s management site for the purpose of receiving wages.

In addition, the Defendant destroyed the property managed by the injured party on six occasions, such as the written list of crimes in attached Table 1, between the above day and February 2, 2015.

2. On January 26, 2015, from around 15:00 to 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim E-stock company’s new construction site and from around 15:00 on the same day, the representative director of the said company visited the said new construction site by two employees who are directors of the said company, G, Qimeri comprehensive financial securities company, and two employees in the name of H stock company, who are non-existence of the name of the said company, to select the new construction site; however, the Defendant interfered with the said new construction work for about three hours by force by leaving the entrance door and preventing on the site.

In addition, from the above day to February 6, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the said new construction work three times, such as the list of crimes in attached Table 2, from the above day to February 6, 2015.

1. "2015 Godan 1552"

arrow