(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.10 2017나23112

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.10 2017나23112

임대차보증금

Text

1. All of the defendant's appeal and counterclaim claims against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

Reasons

1. On December 19, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building C (hereinafter “instant building”) No. 701 (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant for the lease deposit of KRW 60 million; (b) monthly rent of KRW 350,00; and (c) paid the security deposit; and (d) the Plaintiff returned the leased object to the Defendant upon the expiration of the lease contract period; (b) however, the Defendant returned the leased object to the Defendant; (c) there was no dispute between the parties; or (d) comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence No. 1 through No. 5.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 670,000 won the remainder of the deposit deposit and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from February 20, 2016 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case.

2. As to the counterclaim claim, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff damaged the plaintiff's repair cost of 200,000 won of the building of this case by causing damage to the plaintiff's repair cost of the building of this case. ② The plaintiff damaged that the water supply cost of 7,50,000 won of the water supply cost of the water supply cost of the water supply cost of the water supply of the water supply hole to the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of this case. ③ The water supply cost of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of this case was 80,000 won of the water supply cost of the water of the water of the water of this case, ④ the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of the water of this case, the water of the plaintiff was damaged to the defendant.

The lessor is obligated to allow the lessee to use and take profits from the object, and even if the lessee has damaged the object in the course of use, such damage is ordinary.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.03.19 2014나30121

-인천지방법원 2019.05.30 2018나51884

-울산지방법원 2014.12.11 2012가합4271

-부산지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고정3757

-부산지방법원 2016.02.18 2015가단54734