logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.02 2013고단9486
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On November 7, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:44, and driven the road of five-lanes in front of the side intersection in Busan-gu, Busan-do, along the two-lanes from the intersection.

At this point, since it was an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to reduce speed to persons engaged in driving of motor vehicles, and to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to do so and the signal was changed to red signal, the Defendant got off the side part of the Daltob, which the victim C drives from the direction of the Busan Jin Police Station, in the direction of the Busan Jin Police Station, due to the negligence of entering the intersection as is, and caused to go beyond the left side part of the said car.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the right-hand lag, which requires treatment for about 16 weeks from the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Traffic accident reports, each investigation report, and diagnosis reports and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the degree of damage, but the defendant agreed with the victim, and the vehicle in this case is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, the defendant is the primary offender, and the circumstances such as the violation of the law are considered) or more.

arrow