The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant is the head of B (hereinafter “B”) established to efficiently promote technological innovation and informatization management of small and medium enterprises pursuant to Article 20 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises (hereinafter “Small and Medium Enterprises”), and is entrusted by the head of the small and medium enterprises (the Minister of the current Vice Minister of the Small and Medium Enterprises) with the duties of restricting participation in the technological innovation promotion support projects and recovering contributions.

B. On January 6, 2017, the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration (hereinafter “B”) designated each specialized institution and each local Small and Medium Business Administration (former Local Small and Medium Venture Business Administration) as the management agency and publicly announced the “C implementation plan”.

(c)

On December 20, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the development of technologies for small and medium enterprises (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Defendant, who is the head of an institution specialized in the foregoing technology development project, on December 20, 2017, regarding the instant task (hereinafter “instant task”). From October 23, 2017 to July 22, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the development of technologies for small and medium enterprises (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(d)

After the completion of the period of technological development, the head of the Daegu-do Small and Medium Venture Business Co., Ltd. conducted a final inspection on the instant task in accordance with the instant agreement and the statutes promoting innovation of technologies of small and medium enterprises, and on December 21, 2018, the details of expenditure in violation of the management guidelines were found, and on December 21, 2018, notified the Plaintiff of the result of settlement of project costs with the settlement amount of KRW 47,898,785 out of the non-approval amount of project costs (limited to the total amount of government contributions).

E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff asserted that the result of the above project cost settlement was unfair and that the head of the Daegu Gyeong-gu Gyeong-gu Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-si Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-gu Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-gu Gyeong-si Gyeong-gu Gyeong-si Gyeong-dong Gyeong-gu Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-gu Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-gu Gyeong