The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the head of the operating management team of the IB, which manages the “H” building, which is an aggregate building in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G.

Defendant

A around November 21, 2014, around 13:30 on November 21, 2014, around 2013:13:30, the victim J demanded suspension of business on the ground that the victim J's health beverage sales store in the 9th floor of the above building violated the type of business under the management regulations, and took measures for the suspension of business for about 2:30 minutes and more.

Accordingly, Defendant A interfered with the victim's health drinking business by force.

Defendant B, “2015 High 703,” committed the following crimes in collusion with A, who is the managing leader of the said Company, as the managing director of the said Company, and Defendant C, as the managing director of the said Company.

1. In the event that the above Defendants wish to take the preceding measures as part of the business sanctions in accordance with the rules of the H management short-term management unit, the management unit was subject to the resolution of the representative committee, despite the fact that the victim J violated the designated type of business, the said Defendants obstructed the victim’s duties by taking a short-term measure on November 21, 2014, on the ground that they violated the designated type of business, at around 13:30 on November 21, 2014, the victim J violated the rules of the representative committee, thereby obstructing the victim

2. On November 21, 2014, the said Defendants once taking a short-term measure as prescribed in paragraph 1, provided that the victim does not resume his/her business, and connect all the weeks for storing food materials at around 14:50 on November 21, 2014.

However, as the victim resumes its business, without the resolution of the representative committee at around 17:00 on December 8, 2014, the victim took measures again at the above "K" place of business and obstructed the victim's business.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the Defendants may be recognized as having taken a short-term measure as stated in the facts charged. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged, each of the instant actions by the Defendants is the motive or motive.