The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant was punished several times for the same or similar crimes in the past (limited to four times of fine and two times of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment); (b) in particular, on July 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of the suspension of execution on July 25, 2013 due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Crime of Violence against Drivers, etc.), which was sentenced to three years of the suspension of execution on July 25, 2013; (c) and (d) the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes, even though the judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2013, it is unfair that the

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor in the judgment, the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, the defendant agreed with the victim D not to be punished, the defendant paid 214,500 won for the portable electricity repair cost, which is a public article damaged by the defendant, and the defendant has to lead a prison life for a considerable period of time after the suspension of execution is invalidated if the defendant is sentenced to a punishment in this case. This is somewhat harsh aspect, and the defendant supports the children who are elementary school school students alone with disabilities in the sixth degree, and the detention of the defendant entails excessive difficulty in the defendant's survival. In full view of all the circumstances such as the defendant's character, conduct and environment, the circumstances and result of each of the crimes in this case, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all the conditions for the sentence specified in the records and arguments, the prosecutor's assertion above is without merit, and thus, is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.