logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.10.08 2014고단1652
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 28, 2008, the defendant was issued a summary order of 2 million won as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on November 28, 2008 as well as a fine of 1 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 6, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, at around 07:00, driving a DNA dump car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.110%, and driving it along the three-lanes in the intersection of the intersection in the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection in the direction of the wave.

There was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by checking the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of a part of the back part of the Fsch Rexton car driven by the victim E (W, age 42) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time and at the same time, driven a DNA car in the state of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of 0.110% from the front road of the intersection in the same hour from the front road to the intersection road in the same hour.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, and again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the prohibition of drunk driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. A statement of damage from E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal records;

arrow