logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.11.09 2019노2621
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal and the sentencing (in original cases, one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 40 hours of probation, 120 hours of community service, 3 years of restricted employment);

2. The issue of the prosecutor’s cryptive, based on the judgment knife, the background and method of the crime, etc., is right.

However, in full view of the circumstances determined by the lower court and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the lower court’s sentencing is acceptable and it is not unreasonable for the prosecutor to assert.

(On the other hand, while adopting a video file CD as evidence by the prosecutor, the court below erred in failing to examine evidence under Article 292-3 of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 134-8(3) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, but there is no influence on the conclusion of the judgment, as it can be found guilty of facts charged even

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow