A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

All applications filed by applicants for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 24, 2015.

The Defendant is a person who operated the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Loan Brokerage Business G from January 2013 to January 2014, and the victim C, E, and D are working as an employee of the said company.

1. On May 9, 2013, the Defendant against the victim C, at the above company office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, to the victim C, “A person Ha in the Republic of Korea is operating a “J restaurant” at Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and the funds are urgently needed. When he/she lends KRW 30,000,000 to 1,00,000 each day, he/she shall repay the money to the victim C within one month after he/she has repaid the interest.

“.....”

However, the Defendant borrowed the money from the injured party to H to receive 10% interest per week, and even if the Defendant received all the money borrowed from H, he/she thought that he/she should do so so, such as hiding the money to the injured party and borrowing the money again to H and receiving interest rate, and he/she did not have any intention or ability to pay the money within one month each day.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 30,000,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account of the Defendant.

2. On June 12, 2013, the Defendant against the victim E, at the above company office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on or around June 12, 2013, the Victim E operates a “J restaurant” in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and the funds are urgently needed, and the Defendant will pay money within one week from the lending of money and pay interest.

“.....”

However, the facts are that the defendant borrowed money from the damaged person to H with the interest of 10% per week, and then the damaged person from H.