1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,704,030 as well as 5% per annum from December 28, 2016 to January 29, 2019, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the Parties, or may be admitted by adding to the whole purport of the pleadings, each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 7 (including paper numbers).

(1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant operate a real estate brokerage office on the first floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Commercial Building, respectively.

(2) On December 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the 13:35th floor office of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, carried out a telephone call with the Plaintiff, and found the Plaintiff’s real estate office and carried out the Plaintiff’s expenses, caused the Plaintiff’s injury to the Plaintiff, such as a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee and a bee andgs of the Plaintiff.

(3) On April 7, 2017, the Defendant was indicted for an injury, and the summary order of KRW 1,000,000 was issued, and the said summary order became final and conclusive on May 9, 2017.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff was subject to a non-prosecution disposition on suspicion of injury.

(4) The Plaintiff was diagnosed as the above injury that “the open upper part around the snow, the open upper part around the snow, the outer upper part, and the damage of the detailed emulsion, and the damage of the detailed emulsion,” and performed the emulsion with the emulsion including the emulsion. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the emulsion, the emulsion and the emulsion, the emulsion and the emulsion, the emulsion and the emulsion of the emulsion.g., the Plaintiff was diagnosed.”

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is responsible for compensating for physical and mental damages suffered by the plaintiff due to illegal acts, such as his/her own assault.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. If the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the evidence evidence Nos. 6 through 8, it is recognized that the Plaintiff paid the sum of KRW 954,030,030, as the Plaintiff received treatment from the above injury from December 28, 2016 to July 20, 2017, since it is recognized that the Plaintiff spent the total amount of KRW 954,030,00 in the mental health department.

(b)a medical treatment hospital in the future.