The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (3 million won) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is recognized that the defendant agreed with the victim by the court below.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was in progress in relation to the crime of interference with the business committed on June 29, 2014, and committed the instant crime again without being aware of the fact that he/she had been punished by a majority of violent crimes, as well as had the history of having already been punished once in 2010 and twice in 2014 due to the crime of interference with the business.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.