logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.10.02 2018고정591
실화
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2017, from around 23:20 to 23:36, the Defendant moved to the front end of the vehicle and moved to the outside of the vehicle without extinguishing fire, while his mother parked in the B-B 3 parking lot in the north-gu B 3, North-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, the victim C, due to the detection of drinking driving, and in the process of avoiding the fire into the front end of the vehicle in order to keep the dog from hiding himself.

The defendant, who was parked in the above B-3 parking lot due to the above negligence of the victim E, and the victim E-owned vehicle and the victim B-owned B-3 building parking lot, and the victim G, were moved to the ceiling and external wall of the parking lot, and there was a plan for the postponement of fire due to inside fire Nos. B205, 305, and 402.

After the report, the fire officers called B was fired before they moved to the entire 3 units.

Accordingly, the defendant, by negligence, destroyed the victim C's unclaimed vehicles, F Hete vehicle with an amount of KRW 5 million in the market price of KRW 5 million in the victim E-owned market, and the victim G 3 Dong 2,000, and external walls, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the statute to notify the department related to the report of the case, each of 112 cases

1. Article 170 (1), Article 164 of the Criminal Act (the point of practice for the present building) concerning the facts constituting the crime, Articles 170 (1), 170 (1), and 166 of the Criminal Act (the point of practice for each motor vehicle);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has recognized and reflected his mistake.

Victim G does not want to be punished by the defendant.

There are no criminal records which exceed the same kind of crime and fine.

However, the defendant is a vehicle with intention and negligence equivalent to that of the defendant.

arrow