1.The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims extended by this court, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

C. The Plaintiff asserts that 1/2 of the operating income should be paid to the Plaintiff from July 1, 2013 to February 29, 2016.

Furthermore, on the basis of annual adjustment of revenues to be paid by the Defendant, the Defendant asserts that, based on the annual adjustment of revenues, the Plaintiff’s total amount of KRW 568,320,00 (i.e., KRW 187,028,000, KRW 207,81,000, KRW 173,481,00 in 2012) average of KRW 189,440,000 in 207,81,000 in 2012 (i.e., KRW 568,320,000 in ± three years) calculated by dividing the amount of 15,786,666 in 20 from 2010 to February 29, 2016 (i.e., KRW 15,78,320,000 in ±6366,67,3665,675,675,67

The total proceeds of dividends of the annual total proceeds of * 302,144,000,144,000 422,056,000 211,028,000 187,028,028,028,000 301 764,849,000 300 301,227,200 463,622,00 231,81,000 207,811,000 207,81,811,000 200 671,408,000 276,440,000 276,446,000 276,000 397,481,000 197,17381,000 / [20,000 / 201 of the annual proceeds of dividends

Even if the amount of dividends should be determined based on the actual profit accrued after July 1, 2013, and further, the defendant should deduct the retirement allowance paid after the defendant's sole opening business, the cost of repairing the store of this case, and the security deposit for the store of this case from the amount of dividends to be paid by the defendant.

3. The reasoning of this court concerning this part of the judgment on this issue is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment.