logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.21 2019고단2797
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 23, 2019, around 03:05 on March 23, 2019, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building D, 112 reported telephones that “the sound in which the Defendant was frighting to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported telephone cases.

2. 2019. 4. 22.자 범행 피고인은 2019. 4. 22. 00:46경 서울 관악구 C건물 D호에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 ‘위층에서 쿵쾅거리면서 물건을 던지는 것 같아 무섭다’는 112신고전화를 받고 출동한 E지구대 소속 경장 G, 경위 H로부터 소음을 발생한 경위에 대해 질문을 받자 화가 나, 위 경찰관들에게 “나 공무집행방해로 처벌 받았다. 씹할 새끼야. 잡아가. 들어와.”라고 욕설하고, 위 경찰관들을 향해 주거지에 설치된 옷을 걸어두는 행거를 휘둘렀으며, 바닥에 놓여있는 검은색 띠를 휘둘러 위 G를 맞추어 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported telephone cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, I, J, B, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing video CDs, CDs, motion pictures CDs, etc.;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant of this case's reasons for sentencing under Article 32 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (the defendant does not constitute an offense subject to a compensation order under each subparagraph of Article 25 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings).

arrow