logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.26 2014가단109508
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract between the Defendant and the beneficiary and the insured as the Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s non-dividend health insurance on October 16, 2012 (hereinafter “instant Type 1 insurance”).

(2) On November 28, 2012, savings insurance (hereinafter referred to as “instant 2 insurance”) to be used to engage in the business of making a dividend without dividend (hereinafter referred to as “instant 2 insurance”).

(2) On December 10, 2012, the Plaintiff, a local government-invested public corporation, and a local government-invested public corporation (hereinafter “instant Type 3 insurance”).

(2) Each of the insurance policies of this case (hereinafter referred to as "each of the insurance policies of this case"), including the first, second, and third insurance policies of this case.

(2) The purchase amount of the insurance contract for the injury injury injury is KRW 100,000,00 for the first insurance contract of this case, and the second insurance contract of this case is KRW 1,000,000 for the second insurance contract of this case, and the third insurance contract of this case is KRW 150,000 for the third insurance contract of this case.

3) The main contents of the insurance terms and conditions related to the insurance benefit for the injury injury injury are as shown in the attached sheet. (B) On June 19, 2013, the Plaintiff was driving a B-car on June 15:50, 2013, and was under the influence of C while waiting for the signal at the school distance intersection at the 1st, Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government District Court, the Plaintiff was under the influence of C, and thereby, was under the injury of the light fluoral base, etc.

(2) On February 5, 2014, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of the latter disability called “protruding Upboard 4-5-6” at a hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul. (c) The Plaintiff claimed insurance money from the Defendant to pay the insurance proceeds for the injury inflicted after the injury under each of the instant insurance contracts. (d) On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s physical examination conducted a physical examination with respect to the Plaintiff at a hospital affiliated with the university and college of the Gyeonghee University, as a result of the instant accident, appears to have caused the symptoms of the escape of the protruding up board for two years after the accident. However, there was no dispute over the facts that there was no dispute, A. 1 through 5, and A. 7 (Ga number).

arrow