1. The Defendants shall acquire by prescription on October 26, 201 with respect to each of 1/5 shares of 678 square meters, among the total amount of 678 square meters in Masung-gun G, Jeonnam-gun.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the head of the deceased H (Death on March 23, 2010). The deceased I (Death on January 9, 1996) is the dubeds of the deceased H. The Defendants inherited the deceased I’s property as the heir of the deceased I in proportion to 1/5 shares, respectively.

B. The network I completed the registration of transfer of ownership on October 10, 1948 with respect to the land of 678 square meters per previous Masung-gun G (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. On December 19, 1959, the network H married with the J on December 19, 1959, and thereafter, the instant land was cultivated, such as bean, dydne, dydne, shoulder, etc., and the network I and the Defendants sent back to Seoul around 1972 without coming to and going from the network H and their families.

The deceased H and the plaintiff moved to the land of this case the plaintiff's sculptures and Materns graves installed in another place around 1991. Around 209, the plaintiff moved to the land of this case the plaintiff's ancient sculptures, Materns, Materns, Materns, and Materns graves installed in another place.

E. As the deceased H died on March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff buried the deceased H’s grave in the instant land.

F. From 191 to 2010, the Plaintiff paid taxes on the instant land from 1991 to 2010, and from 2011, after the deceased H’s death, the Plaintiff paid taxes on the instant land.

G. Meanwhile, on August 28, 2017, the deceased H’s inheritors, including the Plaintiff, agreed on the division of inherited property with the content that the instant land was owned solely by the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Gap evidence No. 8 through 11, Gap evidence No. 7, video of Gap evidence No. 13 (including the number of evidence with additional evidence), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Around 1959, the Plaintiff’s father, the father of the Plaintiff’s assertion, married with J, donated the instant land from the deceased I, his father, and cultivated the instant land as dry field. From around 1991, the Plaintiff was in possession of the instant land from around 2010 to around 201 after the deceased of the deceased.

Therefore, it is necessary.