Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 6:10 on November 14, 2016, the building was under construction in the B of the Busan Shipping Daegu Metropolitan Government, and was intruded into the building through the entrance door of the entrance, which was not corrected; (b) on the part of the head of the Shari-gu, Busan Metropolitan City; (c) on the part of the head of the Shari-gu; and (d) on the part of the head of the Shari-gu, the Defendant stolen the building with the amounting to KRW 497,00,00 at the market price of the victim D-owned sea-owned, which was under the custody of the
2. Around December 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) intruded into the building through the entrance door of the entrance, which was not corrected on December 24, 2016, around 06:13; (b) used any cresh in the construction site; and (c) owned by the victim E, who was in storage in a temporary warehouse of the said building, and was in the storage of the said temporary warehouse, at a creshed construction site; (d) KRW 100,000 per market price; (e) KRW 25,00 won per steel kib (10; (e) KRW 510,00,000, KRW 45,000, KRW 150,000, KRW 100, KRW 108,000, market price of the said building; and (e) KRW 30,000, KRW 108,000, market price of the said building.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. A E-document;
1. Report on internal investigation (the face of a suspected victim taken from the on-site CCTV), report on internal investigation (the face of a suspected victim taken from CCTV near the site), report on internal investigation (the face of a crime committed by a suspected victim), report on internal investigation (the inside of a suspected victim's vehicle operated by his/her own), each protocol of seizure, and the application of the statutes governing the list of seizure lists;
1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be taken into consideration in favor of the people in mind):
1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, each of the crimes of this case is disadvantageous to the Defendant, who stolen tools from a building newly constructed at night on two occasions, and the nature of such crimes is not less light.