A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is in a relationship with a victim B (n, 37 years of age).

On November 16, 2019, at around 02:00, the Defendant collected a knife (25.5cm in total length, 12.5cm in length on the knife) which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen where the knife had the knife and knife had the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation record of the police suspect B;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Photographs of the upper part of B;

1. Kakakao Stockholm photographs;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the contents of the report;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

2. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months but not more than five years;

2. Scope of recommending sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months but not more than one year.

(a) Basic crimes: Crimes of special injury [Determination of types] Crimes of bodily injury, injury by special injury and repeated crime [Type 1] Special injury [Special Aggravation] mitigated element: Reduction element of punishment (the area of recommendation and the scope of recommendation): From four months to one year; Imprisonment;

(b) The range of recommendations corrected according to the applicable sentences: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months nor more than one year; and

3. The Defendant, while making a horse fighting with the victim, was in the top of the victim’s knife who was in a knife as indicated in its reasoning.

Considering the method of crime, there are many risks of danger so that the quality of crime is not very good.

However, the defendant seems to have led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

The injured party continues to meet with the accused on the premise of marriage, and the injured party does not want the punishment of the accused.

The defendant does not have the same power and is due to drinking.