logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.23 2017누76557
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is that the reasoning of the first instance judgment is identical to that of Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the “this court” of the first instance judgment No. 3 is deemed as “the first instance court and this court” as “the first instance court and this court.”

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow