A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) urged the victims of the instant accident to return home to Korea, on August 16, 2018, at the D convenience stores located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, under the influence of alcohol and taking a bath, etc. at the D convenience stores located in Ulsan-gu, U.S. and reported 112; and (b) recommended the victim F. (48 taxes) and the slope victim G (47 taxes) of the Ulsan-dong Police Station E commander of the Ulsan-dong Police Station: (c) while employees H and the Defendant are working in the workplace of his employee H and the Defendant; (d) “A fins, fins, fins, was bad

"Publicly insulting victims by public obsing them such as ‘'.

2. On August 16, 2018, at around 02:27:27:1, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender of the offense of insult, and was on board the back seat of the patrol line, and was in the E box by E., the Defendant: (a) took one stop of the sloping G’s sloping on the side of the patrol line; (b) taken one stop of the left slopingbucks on one occasion due to the sloping engine; and (c) took one stop of the left slopings on one occasion; and (d) at the E box located in the jurisdiction of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S. on the same day, “this spaths are immediately h and spathr’s family members,” and (d) took part of the right part of the KK’s ice management duties, and (e) took part of the ice sprink.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest and investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, K, G, and I;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 44-2 of the Medical Care and Custody Act [the scope of a recommended sentence] shall interfere with the execution of official duties. The first type of order (the obstruction of the performance of official duties/the coercion of official duties) shall be the reason for obstructing the execution of official duties.