In the case of crimes No. 1 and No. 2, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months or 3 months, or by imprisonment with prison labor for 4 and 5 months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to commit a crime of fraud or a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Busan District Court on February 23, 2012 (hereinafter “final judgment”), and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2012 (hereinafter “final judgment”) and completed the execution of the sentence. On December 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for fraud and was finally decided on February 27, 2014 (hereinafter “final judgment”) (hereinafter “final judgment”). “2016 Gohap802”).

1. 자전거 사업 투자금 명목 사기 피고인은 2009. 8. 경 부산 사상구 D에 있는 피해자 E(49 세) 의 사무실에서 피해자에게 “ 중국에 자전거 샘플을 만들어 놨는데 관공서에 납품해야 된다.

Expenses are required.

In addition, I will pay the money in full.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not actually produce a bicycle sample in China, and there was no intention or ability to conduct a bicycle business.

According to the records from around September 2, 2009 to around September 29, 201, as stated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, was clearly erroneous in the facts constituting the crime in the case No. 802, “as of September 11, 2012,” in paragraph (1) of the indictment, “as of September 2012, 201”. Thus, the Defendant’s ex officio correction without any changes in the indictment is made.

up to 17 times in total, 200,000 won was remitted and acquired through remittance.

2. On December 3, 2009, the Defendant was aware of the victim’s public official in charge of the pertinent department’s violation of the name of the personnel solicitation and the defense justice at the above office around December 3, 2009.

It will be changed to Daegu.

“............” The person believed this was given KRW 2,00,000 in favor of the injured party for solicitation.

However, the defendant was trying to use money from the injured party for the cost of living, and actually solicits public officials to do so.