1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The facts below the basic facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, 6, and Eul evidence No. 4 (including, if any, branch numbers).

Around February 2014, the Defendant: (a) as between B and C operating a company B; (b) as between C and D located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “instant Corporation”); (c) as between D and D, the instant Corporation

3. A subcontract was concluded until 29.

B. On February 24, 2014, the Plaintiff leased one of the mid-term equipment (CCH-1000, 100 tons) owned by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff’s mid-term equipment usage fee of KRW 16.5 million (including value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) from that date, and entered into a lease agreement with respect to the subject and scope of transportation cost-sharing for the mid-term equipment (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Defendant’s F signed the instant agreement with the meaning that C guarantees the obligation owed to the Plaintiff under the instant agreement.

Article 5:All transportation costs incurred in moving leased equipment shall be borne by “B (C or Defendant; hereinafter the same shall apply)”.

Pursuant to Article 14(1) of the former Local Tax Act (including value-added tax at KRW 5,500,000,000) of the former Local Tax Act (including value-added tax at KRW 5.5 million)),

C. C used a flag by April 10, 2014 under the instant contract, and during that period, the user fee for the equipment generated during the said period was total of KRW 26.4 million [=16.5 million (from February 24, 2014).

3. 9 million won (from March 24, 2014 to March 23) 9.9 million won;

4. It is 18 days until October 19).

The defendant paid 3850,000 won to the plaintiff with the costs of dismantling the climate.

E. The Plaintiff’s KRW 15 million from C on April 1, 2014, and the same year

5. 26. The Defendant received KRW 14.5 million, respectively.

2. The assertion;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the surety, and C uses the stude up to April 10, 2014.