1. Of the principal lawsuit of this case, the part of the conjunctive claim against the Plaintiff’s interest at issue is dismissed.

Basic Facts

A. The network N was under the assessment of the 199 square meters of CO forest land in Silung-si (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”), and the Sinsi-si 1921 (Seoul 10.0.)

8.3. Death.

The network P and the network Q will become a part of the network N.

나. 망 P은 1939.(昭和 14.)

9. The deceased on 29. 29. He succeeded to Australia P of his South-North Net.

The network R died on May 29, 1987, and the intervenors jointly inherited the network.

C. The net Q died on December 6, 1949, and the net Q was inherited by Australia.

The deceased B died on May 2, 2018 during the instant lawsuit, and Defendant C, a co-inheritors, took over the deceased B’s lawsuit.

The Defendant Sinsi-si admitted the instant land as of December 17, 2015, which was divided into the instant land before the instant partition, as of December 17, 2015, and deposited KRW 112,890,000,000 for the relevant expropriation compensation pursuant to Article 40(2)2 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (hereinafter “Public Works Act”) on the grounds that the instant land cannot be identified as unregistered land, on December 14, 2015.

(이하 ‘이 사건 공탁’이라 한다). [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1 내지 7호증, 을가 제1 내지 4호증, 을나 제1 내지 4, 6호증, 병 제1, 2호증(가지번호 있는 경우 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지 본소에 관한 판단 원고의 주장 1) 이 사건 토지는 원고의 조부(祖父) 망 T(개명전 U) 및 그 가족들이 1935. 5.경부터 그 지상에 농사를 짓는 등으로 이를 점유사용해 왔을 뿐만 아니라, 원고가 1968. 7. 27.경 그 지상에 원고의 부(父 망 V의 분묘를 설치하여 그 때부터 현재까지 이를 점유사용해 왔다.

Therefore, the period of prescription for the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land was completed on July 27, 198, after the lapse of 20 years from July 27, 1968 when the Plaintiff occupied the instant land.

Therefore, this is therefore.