(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.20 2014나65815

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.20 2014나65815

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates a cosmetic in the trade name of “C”.

B. On February 27, 2010, the Defendant entered into a labor contract (Evidence A 1; hereinafter “instant written pledge”) between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, wherein the Defendant received technical education and education from the Plaintiff for a certain period of time and served as an instructor and the Defendant would receive wages in return, and entered into a written pledge (Evidence A 1; hereinafter “instant written pledge”). The written pledge =

3. The term of a labor contract: The monthly salary of 1.3 million won per year from February 27, 2010 to February 27, 2013: the two-year working hours; the three-year working hours; the 1.5 million won per year; the three-year working hours; the 10:00 to 18:00; the 13:00 to 14:00 to 00; the 13:00 to 14:00 to 003); the 1.5th working period; the : the 1.5th training period; the 2010 to 27.3, 2010; the 3.6. The 1.6. The 1.th technical education shall be provided with technical education and the 3.6 million working conditions under the 1.6 million (the 2.6.th working hours) on condition that the 3.6.06 million won or more; the 1.6.

8. When the damages Gap violated the content of Section 7 of this pledge and the Employee Service Rules, the damages Gap may cancel the working conditions to Section 2.

Provided, That in the event of cancellation due to Eul, Eul shall compensate Gap for the following:

- Pursuant to paragraph 6, the main contents of the written pledge of KRW 9 million in the difference between technical education and various know-how education are as follows:

(A) The term “A” and “B” refer to the Defendant.

The Defendant paid KRW 3 million to the Plaintiff as educational expenses, and received full technical education, instructors education, etc. from March 10, 2010 to December 22 of the same year from the Plaintiff.

On January 2, 2012, the defendant retired from office without consultation with the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.11 2016가단150112

-전주지방법원남원지원 2015.01.28 2014가단1226

-서울서부지방법원 2020.01.10 2019나33511

-서울고등법원 2015.12.11 2015나4049