Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and on February 11, 2015, the judgment became final and conclusive on February 11, 2015.

On July 10, 2014, around 01:32, at the main point of "F" of the Gangnam-gu Seoul underground 1st century, the Defendants followed that Defendant A’s female-friendly G was engaged in as the main employee, and Defendant A’s victim H (ma, 33 years of age), and victim I (n, 29 years of age) made a false statement. Defendant A threatened the victim’s h's breath with the victim’s h's kick at once on the floor of hand, and threatened the victim’s h's head with his h's head at one time on the floor of hand, and the victim B h's head at one time on the two h's head as the main disease.

As a result, the defendants jointly suffered from the victim H with the closed scopic scopher which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment, and the victim I suffered the face scopic scopher which could not know the number of treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to I, H and J;

1. Video-recording CDs and caps taken;

1. A medical certificate of injury, or victim's photograph;

1. Each written agreement, and applications for carbon;

1. Application of each criminal history record, investigation reporting statute;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of the Defendants’ assault on the grounds of sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not include the case itself such as taking a victim H’s serious injury.

However, contingent crimes are contingent crimes, the defendants are divided in depth, and the victims have made efforts to commit and compensate for the victims to the maximum extent possible, and the victims want to take the measures of the defendants.