The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case based on the C’s statement that lacks credibility is erroneous, where the Defendant did not inflict an injury on C, and C merely suffered an injury from two adults in the name-free adult.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: (i) C has consistently made a specific and consistent statement from the police to the court of the court below regarding the facts injured by the defendant; (ii) although C has been divided into D and alcohol at the time of the instant crime, it is deemed that it would be possible to sufficiently memory the situation at the time; (iii) police officers dispatched to the scene at the time stated in the court of the court of the court below that “D would have come to the “A” from the scene of the crime; and (iv) At the time, the police officers stated that “D would be drinking and drinking to the same publicly notified source; and (v) there was a conflict between D and D’s statement as to whether it was important to support C’s statement at the scene immediately after the instant crime; and (v) when the police officers made a statement to the effect that “D 1” was inside the court of the court of the first instance.