logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단2938
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around 00:00 on May 18, 2016 to around 50 minutes, within the main point of “D” operated by the victim C in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. From around 00:0 on May 18, 2016, the Defendant entered the victim’s “humping only alcohol and house.”

B. Whether it would be possible to make a different alcoholic beverage or not, and the words of this kind are so large as to be so recommended.

“A person of the same year, where the State is a person.”

“Iskin, Iskin, Iskin, Iskin, Iskin, Iskin, Iskin, Oskin, Oskin

“The victim took a bath and obstructed the victim’s main business by avoiding disturbance.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of investigation;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act includes: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence for the same crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being able to do so during the suspended execution period for the same crime; (c) the Defendant’s crime is committed against himself/herself and does not repeat again; and (d) the victim in agreement with the victim does not want the Defendant’s punishment; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment; (d) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered as favorable circumstances; and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the instant argument, such as the following.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) the police officer F belonging to the Bupyeong-gu E Zone in the Bupyeong-gu Police Station of Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu; and (c) the bitch bitch bitom in the presence of the said C, etc., who was dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report by the said C-C-12 that the Defendant would have avoided the disturbance as above within the main point of “D” operated by Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (d) the bitch bitch bit

Having expressed their desire, “Isker,” “Isker,” etc.

arrow