The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of two million won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected against the Defendant, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim when he delegated the Defendant’s right to transfer to G as to the fourth anniversary of the cemetery (hereinafter “instant cemetery”) as indicated in the judgment of the lower court to the Defendant’s sixth degree of birth.

However, considering the fact that the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant by deceiving the Defendant that he would transfer the graveyard of this case that exists in the forest owned by the victim, and the crime of this case was committed by defrauding KRW 6.9 million from the victim under the pretext of this equipment, there is no record of having been punished several times for the same crime, and there is no evidence to deem that the graveyard of this case was transferred to the victim’s forest, even though more than four years have passed since the crime of this case was committed, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the argument of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, and environment, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.