Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on July 30, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court on October 6, 2008.

Although the Defendant had had a history of driving alcohol twice or more as above, on October 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.121% during blood, and proceeded with a distance of about 1 km from the home plug-ro, 297 to the 60m from the home plug-ro, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, to the front day of the C-san Sports Hall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, investigation reports (a confirmation before and after the driving of a suspect's drinking), and copies of summary order attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good when the defendant drives a vehicle under the influence of two times in spite of the past criminal records of the same kind of crime. However, for the last eight years, there has been no record of being punished for the same kind of act, the defendant has parked the vehicle on the road before the marriage ceremony and has driven the vehicle on the road after drinking the string with the strings, and let the strings drive the vehicle for himself/herself, does not reach a violation of other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, it does not result in the violation of any other traffic-related Acts and subordinate statutes, the defendant's error is divided later, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, etc.