The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's improper argument of sentencing is unfair because the court below's punishment is too large.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant was punished several times due to the same crime, it is inevitable for the Defendant to severely punish the victims with severe punishment, taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant committed the theft of this case against many victims at least 31 times during the period of repeated crime, and the nature of such crime is not somewhat weak; and (b) the damage to the majority of victims has not been actually recovered.

However, it is reasonable to consider for the defendant that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and that some victims expressed their intention not to punish the defendant, and that the amount of damage is relatively minor.

When taking into account such circumstances as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable to the extent that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion is rejected.

3. Conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed for lack of grounds.