The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around 20:30 on May 17, 2017, expressed 30 persons, such as residents, cooperatives, and the parties related to the executory company, etc., in the KAV at the KAV, and responded to an inquiry about the civil petition, the Defendant expressed that “The Defendant expressed that the Defendant, as a general director of the KAC, a director of the KACF, expressed that “the son and the son are flick and flick flick flick flick flick fl, and that the son who did not flick flick flblbl flbl flbl flbl flbl flbl flbl flbl fl fl fl

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Articles 312(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act;

B. On November 16, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, the injured person revoked the complaint against the Defendant.

Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act