logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.06 2016구합1631
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 12, 200, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”), and was staying in the Republic of Korea after the expiration of the period of sojourn (C-3 March 12, 2005), and changed the qualification for the status of stay on October 6, 2008 for other reasons of litigation (G-1). On July 6, 2009, the Plaintiff applied for the extension of the period of stay to the Defendant on July 6, 2009, but was denied on September 7, 2009.

After that, on September 2010, the Plaintiff obtained permission to extend the status of stay from the Defendant for compulsory execution following the winning of a lawsuit. However, on September 21, 201, after the application for extension of the period of stay was denied on September 21, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on November 13, 2014 while staying illegally without departing from the Republic of Korea until October 5, 201, which is the departure deadline.

B. On October 21, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be detrimental to persecution,” which is a requirement for refugee status.

C. On January 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 19, 2016, but the objection was dismissed on May 31, 2016.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 7 evidence, Eul's 4 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. A. Around June 2000, the Plaintiff’s friendship, working as a police in Pakistan, opposed to the Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea, a Islamic country, and the Plaintiff’s defect in around 2007.

After that, on February 201, 201, the Plaintiff returned to Pakistan and brought the Plaintiff’s pro-friendly relationship with Korean women. However, the Plaintiff did not hear the Plaintiff’s horse from the beginning, and the Plaintiff reported the Plaintiff to the police as a Doar and was detained in the detention room.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is a kind of punishment.

arrow