A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) did not receive a demand from the injured party to drink alcohol at the D main points of the victim C’s operation, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Ulsan-si; and (b) did not receive a demand from the injured party; (c) upon receipt of a report, the Defendant returned to his house on the recommendation of the police officer dispatched.

After that, the Defendant returned to D at around 23:40 on the same day while leaving other clothes and wearing a house, and returned to D at around 23:40 on the same day, and whether the Defendant disregards “B” to the victim.

Earcing alcoholic beverages

“I” means “I,” and “I will not sell alcoholic beverages from the injured person.”

1) The phrase “A” refers to a horse and the refusal thereof; she takes a bath at the cooling house without permission; she takes a walk; she takes a walk; she took a walk, and she took a walk, but she did not comply with the demand to return home from a person who suffers from a re-damage.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On September 11, 2017, at around 23:45, the Defendant: (a) was required to return home from the police officer, police officer, etc. belonging to the Ulsan Southern Police Station E District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on business interference-related 112; (b) the Defendant, at around 23:45 on September 11, 2017; and (c) went off the bones of the candlelight.

In doing so, he took a bath, such as this son's age, he saw f's clothes with his hand, flick, and flick at one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and C;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is to assault a police officer who was dispatched after the defendant received a report of interference with his/her duties while taking a serious bath.