The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of lecture attendance order) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, who recognized the facts charged, runs against the Defendant.

However, after around 2000, the Defendant had been sentenced to three times of a fine due to drinking driving, and two times of a fine due to a violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and committed the instant crime.

Drinking driving is a serious crime threatening the life and body of himself/herself and others, and the blood alcohol concentration of this case is considerably high by 0.135%.

In full view of the statutory punishment, the punishment imposed by the Road Traffic Act, the equity of the criminal defendant, the age, character and conduct, the environment, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the sentence of the court below is not deemed unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.