The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's punishment (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The following are circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case; (b) the victim of the crime of indecent act by compulsion of this case wanted to take the Defendant’s wife while taking advantage of the Defendant; (c) it is difficult to see that part of the damage was temporarily returned to the victims, and part of the damage was recovered; (d) the Defendant had no record of being punished for sexual assault before the instant case; and (e) the Defendant was physically handicapped due to lack of hearing ability to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by forcing him to commit an indecent act by deceiving the victim's chest and her chest, and committed a theft of property, such as camera and computer, on three occasions between August 12, 2013 and August 26, 2013. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and ten months at the Jeonju District Court on December 15, 2006 for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on July 23, 2008. On September 13, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and committed the crime on April 2, 2013, which was habitually exempted from the execution of the punishment, and the victim was habitually exempted from punishment for the crime of larceny at least 4 months before the end of the punishment, and each of the thief crimes committed the larceny of this case.