1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A’s patented invention is the patent right of the same invention as below (hereinafter “instant patented invention”), and the patent right is the patent right of the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant patent right”).

The title of the patented invention 1) invention: E (2) filing date/registration number: F/G/patent H3): Claim No. 7

(1) A glass slot (80) which causes re-returns placed on the upper part of the point floor above (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 2”);

(1) Section 30 (30) of the upper floor above: hereinafter referred to as “Composition 3”;

(i) the above sub-storys (40) above (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 4”;

(i) using a method of forming a re-return pattern that causes re-return in the subject matter with characteristics, including, but not limited to, the composition of the subject matter (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 5”).

) 재귀반사 재귀반사(Retro Reflection)란, 광원으로부터 온 빛이 물체의 표면에서 반사되어 다시 광원으로 돌아가는 반사를 말한다. 어떤 각도로 재귀반사 소재에 빛을 비추어도 그 광원의 방향으로 빛을 반사한다. 자동차의 헤드라이트나 후레쉬 빛을 재귀반사 소재에 비추면 빛을 비춘 �향으로 되돌아가 광원에 있는 사람이 쉽게 볼 수 있다. 시트(이하 ‘이 사건 제7항 특허발명’이라 한다

4) The main drawings of the patented invention of this case are as shown in [Attachment 2]. 【Request Nos. 1 through 6, and 8】 The plaintiff did not claim the infringement, and the statement is omitted.

B. Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) is a company established by Plaintiff A, which exclusively uses the patented invention of this case and produces and sells re-returns. The Plaintiff B exclusively produces and sells re-returns using the patented invention of this case.

C. The Defendants’ implementation products are the defendants below the re-return set forth in the [Attachment 1] list, such as the defendant corporation.