The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 00:10 on June 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed a dispute with the victim E, who is an employee of the victim E, with the victim, as he/she was scambling in the toilet front corridor operated by the victim C at the Dju-si Office operated by the petitioner C, with earth in the toilet; (b) the victim E, who is an employee of the victim E, committed an assault with the victim by scambling the victim E; (c) the victim’s chest was scambling the victim E; and (d) the victim C’s chest was tight and kicked once.

2. The instant case is an offense against the victim’s explicit intent that cannot be prosecuted.

(Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. However, since victims submitted a written agreement on September 27, 2019, which was after the prosecution of each of the instant cases, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.