logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.04.06 2017고단1327
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged: as shown in the [Attachment] [Attachment]’s summary of the public prosecution room].

2. On October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," in Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005) that "if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which is in violation of the Constitution (the Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38, Constitutional Court Order 2010).

3. Conclusion: Innocence (former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act) and publication of the summary of judgment (Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act);

arrow