beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant assumes a false name with a financial institution, etc. in compliance with instructions given by telephone financial fraud assistance officers, and is a cash collection scheme that receives and delivers cash from victims;
The Defendant, according to the direction of the above investigator, received the amount of the damage from the victims, and then conspired to acquire money by deceiving many unspecified victims by taking charge of the role of remitting the amount of the money without passbook to his account instructed by him.
Around 08:47 on May 20, 2020, the official of Bosing the name of Bosing the Defendant misrepresented the Cbank staff by telephone to the victim B, and falsely concluding that “Is to obtain a new loan, Is the loan of interest rate lower than that of the present loan. Is to obtain a new loan, Is the existing loan must be repaid preferentially.”
However, even if the employee received money from the victim for the purpose of repayment of the loan, he did not have the intent or ability to make the victim repay the existing loan or to make the loan at a low interest rate.
Around that time, the said Bosing staff instructed the Defendant to receive the victim in cash using telegrams.
The Defendant, at around 13:20 of the same day, committed as if he were D employee after having met the victim at the front of the exit of 11:3,60,000 won in front of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, and subway No. 137 and subway No. 133 of the subway No. 11, and received 13,660,000 won from the victim, from that time to May 22, 2020, in collusion with scaming employees whose names cannot be known four times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and received KRW 59,360,000 by deceiving four victims.
2. Forgery of a falsified private document;
A. According to the above conspiracy, the Defendant: (a) around 13:20 on May 20, 2020; (b) around 13:20 on the place indicated in Paragraph (1); and (c) on the purpose of using the Defendant as if he was a D employee, through the telegram from the said Bosing staff.