The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant was assaulted by the counter-owner of the instant main point in the instant case; (b) the Defendant claimed that he did so to the main point; (c) the Defendant claimed that he did so with the wife; (d) however, there was no hump to other customers and did not

2. The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence, i.e., ① D, employee G, and accompanist I, the main agent of the instant main office of the instant case, i.e., “the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol for at least 15 minutes, and she was able to put the Defendant under the influence of alcohol for at least 15 minutes, and she was able to put the Defendant under the influence of drinking with the wife F, and she was able to take a bath for other customers.”

H In addition, when entering the main points of this case in the court of the court below, whether the defendant would not be required to report to the police because he would enjoy the main points on the floor of the main points.

A. Around 10 to 15 minutes, the first half of this case’s report was made, and the second half of this case’s report was made, and the second half of this case’s report was made, and the second half of this case’s report was made by the second half of this case’s report, and the third half of this case’s motion picture CDs taken by employees G of the second half of this case were recorded with the content that the Defendant took a serious bath with his wife while playing in the main floor. (4) Meanwhile, according to the 112 report processing list, the Defendant was assaulted on April 24, 2017

112 of the same day, at around 23:18, the police at the entrance of the main point of this case confirmed that the defendant was out of the head of this case, and had the defendant receive a first-aid treatment. However, it is recognized that there was no person witnessing the defendant's sexual assault within the main point in addition to the defendant's wife F, who was in a state of full exploitation (the defendant and F stated that the defendant and F was in a situation where it is impossible to make a statement because the statement was not properly made due to a serious brupt and a continuous change of statement was made). According to the above video CD, the defendant and F merely take a bath, and there was no conversation such as assault, or those mentioned in the hospital.