Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the E agency near the Dong station in Ansan-si, and Defendant B is the mutual friendship with each other among those who worked as the employees of the above agency, and the victim F is the customer who visited the above agency and the victim F is the victim of the second disability with delay disability.

1. Defendant A, during the period of Ansan-si on September 12, 2016, Defendant A paid 20% interest on the loan of money to the victim under Article 505-1003 of the former apartment house G 505-dong 1003, supra, until September 2017.

“False speech” was made.

However, the above defendant intended to repay the above defendant's loan by using the fact that the victim could have easily received money with a clear intellectual ability compared to the general public. The above defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay interest or to pay the promise by the date of the promise, even if the loan which was not repaid by the lending company with a credit rating of 7,00,000 won has been borrowed from the damaged party.

Nevertheless, on September 12, 2016, the above Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 6 million from the victim to the new bank account (H) in the name of the above Defendant; (c) received KRW 1 million from the above account on September 19, 2016; (d) received cash transfer of KRW 5 million on the same day; (e) received KRW 5 million from the said account on September 24, 2016; (c) received remittance of KRW 100,000 to the above account on September 24, 2016; and (d) received KRW 17,100,000,000 from the said account on September 28, 2016.

2. Defendant B, around September 13, 2016, at the same place as the above paragraph (1) above, the said Defendant would pay 20% interest on the loan of money to the victim until September 2017.

“False speech” was made.

However, the above defendant knew that he could easily receive money from the injured party through pro-Japanese A, and tried to repay the loan by using it, and at the time, he had a debt of 2 million won from the lending company according to the credit rating 9, and he purchased a vehicle with a loan, and the installment was not paid at the time.