logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.04 2018고정107
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 08:00 on September 18, 2017, the Defendant, along with a side-way side from the gas charging station, proceeded with a motor vehicle from the front road of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the televis. On the other hand, the Defendant transferred the motor vehicle to the Dokdo through the intersection.

There is a duty of care to reduce the speed for a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle to a crosswalk with no signal, etc., and to ensure the safe operation of the motor vehicle by safely reporting the traffic conditions of the front section, the left section, and the left.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side of the vehicle where the defendant drives the victim D (58 tax, n, n) who goes beyond the crosswalk from the right side of the proceeding to the left side of the road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from occupational negligence the injury of the shoulder and the straw of the arms that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CD-related video images of the vehicles boomed;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant was punished for a traffic accident-related crime, while the traffic accident of this case is in violation of the defendant's duty of care, considering the fact that the victim does not live around but has winding up on the crosswalk, etc.

arrow