A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B at a eth-car.

On September 11, 2016, the Defendant operated the above car at around 20:15, and continued to drive the national highway 6 lanes around the 2nd parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel in the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel in Seoul.

At the same time, there was a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, and the vehicle stops along the signal signal atmosphere, so the driver has a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving duty and to set the steering direction and the brake system accurately, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke and failed to view the stroke in the signal atmosphere due to the negligence of not driving the stroke, which was driven by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 65 years old) who was driving by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as the "FI"), followed the stroke part of the stroke part of the above stroke part, and the stroke part, due to the shock, stopped on the two-lanes in the front.

E (56) The upper part following the left-hand side of the FMFW car driven by this e.g., each stop on one lane.

G (64) The part adjacent to the right-hand side of H Twit-Ra car operated by this G (64) and the part behind the J Hasta car driven by this G (55 Do) was chaind annually.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as 8,602,977 won, 4,146,085 won, 1,020,941 won, and 1,020,941 won, and 1,020,941 won for the above TM passenger car, respectively, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle and aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each traffic accident-related statement of C, E, G, and I 1.