logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.22 2011가단292691
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 52,713,458 as well as 5% per annum from January 23, 2010 to August 22, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 04:16, January 23, 2010, Category B: (a) a passenger car at C (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)

) A driver’s license and driving the two-lanes of the three-lanes of Choho-gun, Samho-gun, Young-gun, Samho-gun, and the two-lanes of the three-lanes of the Cho-gun, Young-gun, the speed of 80 to 90km each hour from the ambane bank. At that time, snow ging of the road, which was caused by negligence to neglect the duty of safe driving even if the road was sleeped and stopped at the amblick bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”).

2) The Plaintiff was injured by the Plaintiff’s left-hand body part on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to shocking the Plaintiff’s body part on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle without being faced with the Plaintiff’s sudden discovery and sudden operation (hereinafter “instant accident”) and caused the Plaintiff to suffer the injury, such as the front-hand bank and the laverg of the front-hand side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Before the occurrence of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was driving the Plaintiff’s two-lanes of the said accident site while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was installed on the right side of the road, and the vehicle turned off to the snow, and turned back to 180 degrees and turned back to the two-lanes of the said accident site, and the Plaintiff stopped the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the reverse direction on the two-lanes of the said accident site. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was faced with the instant accident while checking the state of the vehicle driven on the road, while carrying out on the road while checking the state of the vehicle driven on the vehicle, and there was an interval of about five minutes between the Plaintiff’s prior accident and the instant accident. At the time of the instant accident, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was fluentd with the headlight due to the Plaintiff’s prior accident, and the Plaintiff was able to undergo the inspection.

The plaintiff, while driving the plaintiff's vehicle and driving the accident site around the time of the accident in connection with the details of the preceding accident, was concealed by the driver with the driver without the identity, and the plaintiff's vehicle was shocked by this shock.

arrow